Health insurance and socioeconomic disparities in childhood caries

impact on prevalence, treatment, and recurrence in a Swiss private practice

Authors

  • Tamara Perez Division of Regenerative Dental Medicine and Periodontology, University Clinics of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
  • Isabelle Portenier Department of Endodontics, Dental Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • Catherine Giannopoulou Division of Regenerative Dental Medicine and Periodontology, University Clinics of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
  • Alkisti Zekeridou Division of Regenerative Dental Medicine and Periodontology, University Clinics of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61872/sdj-2025-04-02

PMID:

41362237

Keywords:

survey, French-speaking dentists, general anesthesia, caries, socio-economic status

Abstract

Social inequalities are strongly associated with disparities in oral health, particularly in the development of childhood caries. This 4-year cohort study analyzed the impact of socioeconomic status (SES)- defined on the basis of the health insurance type- on the prevalence, treatment, and recurrence of dental caries in children. A total of 198 children (21 with social insurance, 177 with private insurance) were included. Caries prevalence at baseline was significantly higher in children with social insurance (95 % with >4 caries) compared to those with private insurance (29 % with >4 caries). No children with social insurance were caries-free, whereas 35 % of those with private insurance were caries-free. Pulpotomy and extraction needs were higher in the socially insured group, with 43 % requiring pulpotomies and 62 % requiring extractions, compared to 12 % and 10 %, respectively, in the privately insured group. General anesthesia (GA) use was more frequent in the socially insured group (72 % vs. 13 %), especially among younger children (100 % of 2-4 years old vs. 25 % in the private insurance group). In contrast, conventional anesthesia was more frequently used in the private insurance group (31 % vs. 14 %). Recall appointments were less frequent in the socially insured group, with 24% having no follow-up, compared to 12 % in the privately insured group. Caries recurrence was higher in the socially insured group (62 % had >3 new carious lesions) compared to the privately insured group, where 38 % of children had no new caries at follow-up. These findings highlight the impact of SES on caries burden, treatment modalities, and the importance of preventive measures for disadvantaged groups.

References

1. Anil S, Anand PS. Early Childhood Caries: Preva-lence, Risk Factors, and Prevention. Front Pedi-atr. 2017;5:157.

2. WHO. Ending childhood dental caries: WHO implementation manual. Geneva2019.

3. Chhabra C, Sogi HPS, Chhabra KG, Rana S, Gupta S, Sharma P. Social and behavioral de-terminants of early childhood caries: A cross-sectional study within region of Ambala, Hary-ana. J Educ Health Promot. 2022;11:168.

4. Thomson S, Busse R, Crivelli L, van de Ven W, Van de Voorde C. Statutory health insurance competition in Europe: a four-country compari-son. Health Policy. 2013;109(3):209-25.

5. Grieshaber A, Waltimo T, Haschemi AA, Born-stein MM, Kulik EM. Dental caries and associ-ated factors in 7-, 12- and 15-year-old school-children in the canton of Basel-Landschaft, Swit-zerland: Changes in caries experience from 1992 to 2021. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2024;34(2):169-78.

6. Monuteaux MC, Du M, Neuman MI. Evaluation of Insurance Type as a Proxy for Socioeconomic Status in the Pediatric Emergency Department: A Pilot Study. Ann Emerg Med. 2024;83(6):562-7.

7. Alcaino E, Kilpatrick NM, Smith ED. Utilization of day stay general anaesthesia for the provision of dental treatment to children in New South Wales, Australia. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2000;10(3):206-12.

8. Almeida AG, Roseman MM, Sheff M, Hunting-ton N, Hughes CV. Future caries susceptibility in children with early childhood caries following treatment under general anesthesia. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22(4):302-6.

9. Baggio S, Abarca M, Bodenmann P, Gehri M, Madrid C. Early childhood caries in Switzerland: a marker of social inequalities. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15:82.

10. Julihn A, Cunha Soares F, Hjern A, Dahllöf G. Development level of the country of parental origin on dental caries in children of immigrant parents in Sweden. Acta Paediatr. 2021;110(8):2405-14.

11. Costa SM, Martins CC, Bonfim Mde L, Zina LG, Paiva SM, Pordeus IA, et al. A systematic re-view of socio-economic indicators and dental caries in adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012;9(10):3540-74.

12. Lopez DJ, Hegde S, Whelan M, Dashper S, Tsakos G, Singh A. Trends in social inequalities in early childhood caries using population-based clinical data. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2023;51(4):627-35.

13. Portero de la Cruz S, Cebrino J. Oral Health Problems and Utilization of Dental Services Among Spanish and Immigrant Children and Adolescents. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(3).

14. Minervini G, Franco R, Marrapodi MM, Di Blasio M, Ronsivalle V, Cicciù M. Children oral health and parents education status: a cross sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):787.

15. Ramdaw A, Hosey MT, Bernabé E. Factors associated with use of general anaesthesia for dental procedures among British children. Br Dent J. 2017;223(5):339-45.

16. Hsu U, Hui BK, Pourat N. Recall compliance and incidence of dental caries among underserved children. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2015;43(2):77-81.

17. Sundell AL, Ullbro C, Koch G. Evaluation of pre-ventive programs in high caries active pre-school children. Swed Dent J. 2013;37(1):23-9.

18. van Meijerenvan Lunteren AW, Voortman T, Wolvius EB, Kragt L. Adherence to dietary guidelines and dental caries among children: a longitudinal cohort study. Eur J Public Health. 2023;33(4):653-8.

19. Gargano L, Mason MK, Northridge ME. Ad-vancing Oral Health Equity Through School-Based Oral Health Programs: An Ecological Model and Review. Front Public Health. 2019;7:359.

20. Office FS. Recipients of social benefits FSO official site: FSO; 2024 [Available from: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/en/home/statistics/social-security/social-assistance/recipients-social-bene-fits.html#:~:text=The%20rate%20of%20means%2Dtested,to%20the%20simultaneous%20population%20growth.

21. Krol DM, Whelan K, HEALTH TSOO. Maintai-ning and Improving the Oral Health of Young Children. Pediatrics. 2022;151(1).

Downloads

Published

2025-12-09

How to Cite

Perez, T., Portenier, I., Giannopoulou, C., & Zekeridou, A. (2025). Health insurance and socioeconomic disparities in childhood caries: impact on prevalence, treatment, and recurrence in a Swiss private practice. SWISS DENTAL JOURNAL SSO – Science and Clinical Topics, 135(04), 16-26. https://doi.org/10.61872/sdj-2025-04-02

How to Cite

Perez, T., Portenier, I., Giannopoulou, C., & Zekeridou, A. (2025). Health insurance and socioeconomic disparities in childhood caries: impact on prevalence, treatment, and recurrence in a Swiss private practice. SWISS DENTAL JOURNAL SSO – Science and Clinical Topics, 135(04), 16-26. https://doi.org/10.61872/sdj-2025-04-02