Systemische Kommunikation im zahnmedizinischen Kontext
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61872/sdj-2024-04x-06PMID:
39526363Keywords:
Lehre, Nocebo-Effekte, Placebo-Effekte, Systemische KommunikationAbstract
As patients in a dental or medical context, persons find themselves in a vulnerable, exceptional psychological and physical situation, in which the solution-oriented regulation of emotions requires mindful, systemic communication. This review describes typical placebo and nocebo effects in verbal, paraverbal and non-verbal communication and their impact on patients and their relationship with dental or medical professionals. In addition, a training curriculum for second-year undergraduate dental master’s students is described, that not only provides students with the necessary competences for solution-oriented systemic communication, but also enables them to experience its effectiveness in the clinical context.
References
AFILALO M, ETROPOLSKI M S, KUPERWASSER B, KELLY B, OKAMOTO K, HOVE A, VAN STEUP I, LANGE A, RAUSCH-KOLB B, HAEUSSLER J: Efficacy and safety of tapentadol extended release compared with oxycodone controlled release for the management of moderate to severe chronic pain related to osteoarthritis of the knee. Clin Drug Investig 30: 489-505 (2010)
ALCARAZ-IBANEZ M, SICILIA A, BURGUENO R: Social physique anxiety, mental health, and exercise: Analyzing the role of basic psychological needs and psychological inflexibility. Span J Psychol 20: 1-11 (2017)
ARMFIELD J M, HEATON L J: Management of fear and anxiety in the dental clinic: a review. Aust Dent J 58: 390-407 (2013)
BARBER T X: Hypnosis, suggestions, and psychosomatic phenomena: a new look from the standpoint of recent ex-perimental studies. Am J Clin Hypn 21: 13-27 (1978)
BARSKY A J, SAINTFORT R, ROGERS M P, BORUS J F: Nonspecific medication side effects and the nocebo phenome-non. Jama 287: 622-627 (2002)
BENEDETTI F: Placebo and the new physiology of the doctor-patient relationship. Physiol Rev 93: 1207-1246 (2013)
BENEDETTI F: Placebo effects. University Press, Oxford (2020)
BESIMO CE, BESIMO-MEYER RH: Hypno-systemische Kommunikation für Studierende. Suggestionen: 10-12 (2021)
BESIMO C E, ZITZMANN N U, JODA T: Digital Oral Medicine for the Elderly. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17: 2171 (2020)
LEDERGERBER J, BESIMO CE: Placebo und Nocebo in der Kommunikation – Eine systematische Literaturübersicht. Quintessenz 7-8: 1-12 (2024)
CHEEK D B: Importance of recognizing that surgical patients behave as though hypnotized. Am J Clin Hypn 4: 227-236 (1962)
COLAGIURI B, ZACHARIAE R: Patient expectancy and post-chemotherapy nausea: a meta-analysis. Ann Behav Med 40: 3-14 (2010)
DANIELS A, SALLIE R: Headache, lumbar puncture, and expectation. Lancet 317: 1003 (1981)
DWORKIN S F, CHEN A, LERESCHE L, CLARK D W: Cognitive reversal of expected nitrous oxide analgesia for acute pain. Anesth Analg 62: 1073-1077 (1983)
ENCK P, BINGEL U, SCHEDLOWSKI M, RIEF W: The placebo response in medicine: minimize, maximize or personal-ize? Nat Rev Drug Discov 12: 191-204 (2013)
ENKLING N, MARWINSKI G, JÖHREN P: Dental anxiety in a representative sample of residents of a large German city. Clin Oral Investig 10: 84–91 (2006)
HANSEN E, BEJENKE C: Negative and positive suggestions in anaesthesia: Improved communication with anxious surgical patients. Anaesthesist 59: 199-202, 204-196, 208-199 (2010)
HANSEN E: Aufklärungsschäden. Z Gesundheitspolitik 4: 49-59 (2014)
HANSEN E, ZECH N: Nocebo Effects and Negative Suggestions in Daily Clinical Practice - Forms, Impact and Ap-proaches to Avoid Them. Front Pharmacol 10: 77 (2019)
HÄUSER W, HANSEN E, ENCK P: Nocebo phenomena in medicine: their relevance in everyday clinical practice. Dtsch Ärztebl Int 109: 459 (2012)
KONG J, GOLLUB R L, POLICH G, KIRSCH I, LAVIOLETTE P, VANGEL M, ROSEN B, KAPTCHUK T J: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study on the neural mechanisms of hyperalgesic nocebo effect. J Neurosci 28: 13354-13362 (2008)
KRUSE AB, HEIL HK, STRUß N, FABRY G, SILBERNAGEL W, VACH K, RATKA-KRÜGER P, WÖLBER JP: Working experience is not a predictor of good communication: Results from a controlled trial with simulated patients. Eur J Dent Educ 24: 177-185 (2020)
LANCMAN M E, ASCONAPÉ J J, CRAVEN W J, HOWARD G, PENRY J K: Predictive value of induction of psychogenic seizures by suggestion. Ann Neurol 35: 359-361 (1994)
LANG E V, HATSIOPOULOU O, KOCH T, BERBAUM K, LUTGENDORF S, KETTENMANN E V A, LOGAN H, KAPTCHUK T J: Can words hurt? Patient–provider interactions during invasive procedures. Pain 114: 303-309 (2005)
LARSON E B, YAO X: Clinical empathy as emotional labor in the patient-physician relationship. JAMA 293: 1100-1106 (2005)
LOWN B: Die verlorene Kunst des Heilens: Anstiftung zum Umdenken. Klett-Cotta / Schattauer, Stuttgart (2004)
MYERS M G, CAIRNS J A, SINGER J: The consent form as a possible cause of side effects. Clin Pharmacol Ther 42: 250-253 (1987)
PAPADOPOULOS D, MITSIKOSTAS D: Nocebo effects in multiple sclerosis trials: a meta-analysis. Mult Scler 16: 816-828 (2010)
PENFIELD W, RASMUSSEN T: The cerebral cortex of man; a clinical study of localization of function. Macmillan, New York (1950)
RAMSEIER CA, HÜBSCHI C, CRNIĆ T, WÖLBER JP: Implementation of a communication curriculum in undergraduate dental education-students' opinions during a 5-year development phase. Eur J Dent Educ 28: 227-235 (2024)
REEVES RR, LADNER ME, HART RH, BURKE RS : Nocebo effects with antidepressant clinical drug trial placebos. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 29: 275-277 (2007)
RIEF W, NESTORIUC Y, VON LILIENFELD-TOAL A, DOGAN I, SCHREIBER F, HOFMANN S G, BARSKY A J, AVORN J: Differences in adverse effect reporting in placebo groups in SSRI and tricyclic antidepressant trials. Drug Saf 32: 1041-1056 (2009)
RIEF W, BARSKY A J, GLOMBIEWSKI J A, NESTORIUC Y, GLAESMER H, BRAEHLER E: Assessing general side effects in clinical trials: reference data from the general population. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 20: 405-415 (2011)
SILVESTRI A, GALETTA P, CERQUETANI E, MARAZZI G, PATRIZI R, FINI M, ROSANO G M C: Report of erectile dysfunc-tion after therapy with beta-blockers is related to patient knowledge of side effects and is reversed by placebo. Eur heart J 24: 1928-1932 (2003)
TARPY R M: Klassische Konditionierung. In: Tarpy R M: Lernen. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, pp 9-27 (1979)
TEFIKOW S, BARTH J, MAICHROWITZ S, BEELMANN A, STRAUSS B, ROSENDAHL J: Efficacy of hypnosis in adults undergoing surgery or medical procedures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Psychol Rev 33: 623–636 (2013)
WATANABE T, SIEG M, LUNDE S J, TANEJA P, BAAD-HANSEN L, PIGG M, VASE L: What is the nocebo effect and does it apply to dentistry? - A narrative review. J Oral Rehabil 49: 586-591 (2022)
WEHRLI H: Hypnotic communication and hypnosis in clinical practice. Praxis 103: 833-839 (2014)
WILLEMSE J, VON ALMEN F: Theorie und Praxis des systemischen Ansatzes. Die Systemtheorie Watzlawicks und Luhmanns verständlich erklärt. Springer, Berlin und Heidelberg (2018)
WÖLBER JP, DEIMLING D, LANGENBACH D, RATKA-KRÜGER P: The importance of teaching communication in dental education. A survey amongst dentists, students and patients. Eur J Dent Educ 16: e200-204 (2012)
ZECH N, SEEMANN M, GRAF BM, HANSEN E: Nocebo-Effekte - Negativwirkungen der Aufklärung. AINS 50: 64-69 (2015)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Christian Besimo, Julia Ledergerber, Ruth Besimo-Meyer, Nicola U Zitzmann
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
