On the biocompatibility of endodontic sealers

Authors

  • Vasileios Kapralos Department of Endodontics, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • Jannis Böcker Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Kirstin Vach Institute for Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Markus Altenburger Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Susanne Proksch Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Lamprini Karygianni Clinic of Conservative and Preventive Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61872/sdj-2022-09-01

PMID:

35536041

Keywords:

Osteoblasts (MeSH-ID D010006), Endodontics (MeSH-ID D004708), Root Canal Therapy (MeSH-ID D012390), Biocompatibility Testing (MeSH-ID D008422)

Abstract

Periapical tissue may be exposed to root canal filling materials in consequence of root canal therapy. There is scant scientific data about the biocompatibility of root canal filling materials of various chemistry on the periapical area. This study aimed to investigate the effects of different root canal sealers and their eluates on human alveolar osteoblasts in terms of cell proliferation, adhesion, morphology and gene expression in vitro. Five endodontic sealers (AH Plus®, Apexit®, Tubli-Seal®, Real Seal SE®, EndoRez®) and one gutta-percha obturation material (BeeFill®) were tested. Human alveolar osteoblasts derived from 3 different donors following incubation with sealer eluates after 24 h and 72 h were investigated by means of qPCR (gene expression). Morphological reactions of the alveolar osteoblasts were measured by culturing the cells for 3 d, and 7 d and 14 d, respectively, followed by scanning electron microscopy (morphology, adhesion) and fluorescence imaging of the actin cytoskeleton (morphology, proliferation). A repeated measures analysis was performed and p-values were adjusted by Tukey. While all sealers influenced the cell morphology and the expression of genes associated with apoptosis (Casp3), proliferation (histone H3), and inflammation (interleukin-6 and matrix metalloproteinases 1 and 3), mainly AH Plus® and Apexit® yielded a regular actin cytoskeleton and beneficial gene expression patterns. Regarding cell adhesion, only AH Plus® supported proper anchorage for alveolar osteoblasts. Our results provide evidence for the biocompatibility of epoxy resin-based endodontic sealers, i.e. AH Plus®, while other sealers proved cytotoxic for alveolar osteoblasts. Further studies are needed for understanding the bone cell reactions after endodontic treatment and the clinical decision-making regarding the sealer of choice for root canal fillings.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-05

How to Cite

Kapralos, V., Böcker, J., Vach, K., Altenburger, M., Proksch, S., & Karygianni, L. (2022). On the biocompatibility of endodontic sealers . SWISS DENTAL JOURNAL SSO – Science and Clinical Topics, 132(9), 586-597. https://doi.org/10.61872/sdj-2022-09-01

How to Cite

Kapralos, V., Böcker, J., Vach, K., Altenburger, M., Proksch, S., & Karygianni, L. (2022). On the biocompatibility of endodontic sealers . SWISS DENTAL JOURNAL SSO – Science and Clinical Topics, 132(9), 586-597. https://doi.org/10.61872/sdj-2022-09-01