Activity of chlorhexidine formulations on oral microorganisms and periodontal ligament fibroblasts

Authors

  • Alexandra Stähli Department of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland
  • Irina Liakhova Department of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland
  • Barbara Cvikl Department of Conservative Dentistry, Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria
  • Adrian Lussi Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, University Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany and School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland
  • Anton Sculean Department of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland
  • Sigrun Eick Department of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61872/sdj-2021-09-736

PMID:

33512793

Keywords:

biofilm, antiseptics, cytotoxicity

Abstract

Given the importance of microorganisms in the pathogenesis of the two most prevalent oral diseases (i.e. caries and periodontitis), antiseptics are widely used. Among the antiseptics chlorhexidine (CHX) is still considered as gold standard. The purpose of this in-vitro-study was to determine the antimicrobial activity of new CHX digluconate containing formulations produced in Switzerland. Two test formulations, with 0.1% or 0.2% CHX (TestCHX0.1, TestCHX0.2) were compared with 0.1% and 0.2% CHX digluconate solutions (CHXph0.1, CHXph0.2) without additives and with a commercially available formulation containing 0.2% CHX digluconate (CHXcom0.2). The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of the CHX formulations were determined against bacteria associated with caries or periodontal disease. Then the anti-biofilm activities of CHX preparations were tested regarding inhibition of biofilm formation or against an existing biofilm. Further, the cytotoxicity of the CHX preparations against periodontal ligament (PDL) fibroblasts was measured. There were no or only minor differences of the MIC values between the CHX preparations. Except for 0.1% CHXph, all formulations blocked the formation of the biofilms. When analyzing the effect on an established “cariogenic” biofilm, the TestCHX0.2 was most active (- 3.5 log10 colony forming units (cfu); p<0.001 vs. control). The cfu counts of an established periodontal biofilm were most decreased by CHXcom0.2 (-3.9 log10), followed by TestCHX0.2 (-3.34 log10) and CHXph0.2 (-3.0 log10 cfu) (each p<0.001 vs. control). All CHX preparations reduced the viability of the PDL fibroblasts. Taken together, the Swiss made test mouth rinses have an equal or better antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity as the respective CHX solutions and can be recommended.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-06

How to Cite

Stähli, A., Liakhova, I., Cvikl, B., Lussi, A., Sculean, A., & Eick, S. (2021). Activity of chlorhexidine formulations on oral microorganisms and periodontal ligament fibroblasts. SWISS DENTAL JOURNAL SSO – Science and Clinical Topics, 131(9), 705-712. https://doi.org/10.61872/sdj-2021-09-736

How to Cite

Stähli, A., Liakhova, I., Cvikl, B., Lussi, A., Sculean, A., & Eick, S. (2021). Activity of chlorhexidine formulations on oral microorganisms and periodontal ligament fibroblasts. SWISS DENTAL JOURNAL SSO – Science and Clinical Topics, 131(9), 705-712. https://doi.org/10.61872/sdj-2021-09-736